Needs a License #1

New Issue

2014-12-17T19:18:39-05:00

jomo commented

2014-12-17 19:18:39 -05:00

(Migrated from github.com)

We should pick one.

shillingp commented

2014-12-18 07:23:54 -05:00

(Migrated from github.com)

I'm not to knowledgeable on licenses however i don't see what is wrong with the fully free open-source options.

jomo commented

2014-12-18 07:28:20 -05:00

(Migrated from github.com)

Yep, if everyone is fine with it, we could go with MIT.

The MIT License is a permissive license that is short and to the point. It lets people do anything they want with your code as long as they provide attribution back to you and don't hold you liable

from http://choosealicense.com/

Yep, if everyone is fine with it, we could go with MIT. > The MIT License is a permissive license that is short and to the point. It lets people do anything they want with your code as long as they provide attribution back to you and don't hold you liable _from http://choosealicense.com/_

shillingp commented

2014-12-18 07:41:19 -05:00

(Migrated from github.com)

I support MIT license as long as everyone else approves

This repo is archived. You cannot comment on issues.

1 Participants

Due Date

No due date set.

Dependencies

No dependencies set.

Reference: Redstoner/redstoner-utils#1