Needs a License #1

Closed
opened 2014-12-18 00:18:39 +00:00 by jomo · 3 comments
jomo commented 2014-12-18 00:18:39 +00:00 (Migrated from github.com)

We should pick one.

We should pick one.
shillingp commented 2014-12-18 12:23:54 +00:00 (Migrated from github.com)

I'm not to knowledgeable on licenses however i don't see what is wrong with the fully free open-source options.

I'm not to knowledgeable on licenses however i don't see what is wrong with the fully free open-source options.
jomo commented 2014-12-18 12:28:20 +00:00 (Migrated from github.com)

Yep, if everyone is fine with it, we could go with MIT.

The MIT License is a permissive license that is short and to the point. It lets people do anything they want with your code as long as they provide attribution back to you and don't hold you liable

from http://choosealicense.com/

Yep, if everyone is fine with it, we could go with MIT. > The MIT License is a permissive license that is short and to the point. It lets people do anything they want with your code as long as they provide attribution back to you and don't hold you liable _from http://choosealicense.com/_
shillingp commented 2014-12-18 12:41:19 +00:00 (Migrated from github.com)

I support MIT license as long as everyone else approves

I support MIT license as long as everyone else approves
This repo is archived. You cannot comment on issues.
No Milestone
No Assignees
1 Participants
Due Date
The due date is invalid or out of range. Please use the format 'yyyy-mm-dd'.

No due date set.

Dependencies

No dependencies set.

Reference: Redstoner/redstoner-utils#1
No description provided.